Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-06 10:36:04 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8BC25D2A2494492DC4F30CD6D3FBE61440C34CD056ACDE7456B6D46D6C1CDFBE
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article is in fact in preprint with The Lancet. It has not been peer-reviewed yet, though, but this is not claimed in the tweet. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4496137

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1676884087083003905
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8BC25D2A2494492DC4F30CD6D3FBE61440C34CD056ACDE7456B6D46D6C1CDFBE
  • createdAtMillis - 1688639764186
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16768840870830039058BC25D2A2494492DC4F30CD6D3FBE61440C34CD056ACDE7456B6D46D6C1CDFBE