Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-07 19:09:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C657994B1B3D775B7A523D06078917E8682737A4B1CD1000F4EE4C36D6BC9122
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is not a Lancet publication, not peer-reviewed and is considered preliminary. In addition, there were no autopsies performed, only judgments made of previous autopsies. In addition, the doctors conducting the study md neither virologists nor infectious disease specialists. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4496137

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1676820267840962560
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C657994B1B3D775B7A523D06078917E8682737A4B1CD1000F4EE4C36D6BC9122
  • createdAtMillis - 1688756956780
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1676820267840962560C657994B1B3D775B7A523D06078917E8682737A4B1CD1000F4EE4C36D6BC9122