Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-05 17:00:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 049E9E249CF132BD220934A2301413303C9F83D5CC0D861A6488BB5A903CCA42
Participant Details

Original Note:

The 1619 project has been debunked ad nauseum https://reason.com/2022/03/29/the-1619-project-unrepentantly-pushes-junk-history/ https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2020/03/06/1619-project-new-york-times-mistake-122248 https://nypost.com/2023/02/01/to-vilify-our-founders-hulus-1619-ignores-what-actually-sparked-the-american-revolution/ https://www.forbes.com/sites/marybethgasman/2021/06/03/what-history-professors-really-think-about-the-1619-project/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1676629640704671744
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 049E9E249CF132BD220934A2301413303C9F83D5CC0D861A6488BB5A903CCA42
  • createdAtMillis - 1688576430810
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1676629640704671744049E9E249CF132BD220934A2301413303C9F83D5CC0D861A6488BB5A903CCA42