Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-06 14:51:21 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7FFE4ED4E8367F28A70C02F2B05580C2E1280FFECF4485E3516C21F2F1FFF4C9
Participant Details

Original Note:

Twitter may be misrepresenting the rationale for the usage limits. Surprise usage limits do not help "detect and eliminate bots and other bad actors." They reduce Twitter's ability to distinguish usage far over the limits and they do not eliminate anyone.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1676553619435298816
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7FFE4ED4E8367F28A70C02F2B05580C2E1280FFECF4485E3516C21F2F1FFF4C9
  • createdAtMillis - 1688655081671
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16765536194352988167FFE4ED4E8367F28A70C02F2B05580C2E1280FFECF4485E3516C21F2F1FFF4C9