Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-05 13:54:35 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 60F35FE4672A0B52002DC87D4C8422EC543170AEA6D2FFCF93743394F6E505A2
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no evidence of this, only an article from a website belonging to the account that tweeted this. This website has published a number of other sensationalized or unverified claims and has only existed for about 3 months https://www.whois.com/whois/theleadingreport.com

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1676491467190308864
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 60F35FE4672A0B52002DC87D4C8422EC543170AEA6D2FFCF93743394F6E505A2
  • createdAtMillis - 1688565275585
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 167649146719030886460F35FE4672A0B52002DC87D4C8422EC543170AEA6D2FFCF93743394F6E505A2