Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-05 13:25:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B4D0285D53141B8368D72D69A6F24F43F6B95EC4B29505444CA8E1AA2BFAC3E8
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet states as fact that the activities in question were governmental efforts to curtail "disinformation" as opposed to just "information not favorable to the government". It should have read, ". . . a ruling that could curtail efforts to fight alleged disinformation".

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1676421769304088577
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B4D0285D53141B8368D72D69A6F24F43F6B95EC4B29505444CA8E1AA2BFAC3E8
  • createdAtMillis - 1688563549138
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1676421769304088577B4D0285D53141B8368D72D69A6F24F43F6B95EC4B29505444CA8E1AA2BFAC3E8