Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-05 07:44:25 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A56B2F851F9462D6776409BF85616F3C23CC4AE57DAC2E1F2FE387FCB1FCB605
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet states as fact that the activities in question were governmental efforts to curtail "disinformation" as opposed to just "information not favorable to the government". It should have read, ". . . a ruling that could curtail efforts to fight alleged disinformation".

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1676421769304088577
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A56B2F851F9462D6776409BF85616F3C23CC4AE57DAC2E1F2FE387FCB1FCB605
  • createdAtMillis - 1688543065856
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1676421769304088577A56B2F851F9462D6776409BF85616F3C23CC4AE57DAC2E1F2FE387FCB1FCB605