Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-05 06:01:27 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 684E65261B63E8DAB10C28FFE043C033F4BC7F3B3BFD9398678F764A4F9166AD
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet states as fact that the activities in question were governmental efforts to curtail "disinformation" as opposed to just "information not favorable to the government". It should have read, ". . . a ruling that could curtail efforts to fight alleged disinformation".

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1676421769304088577
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 684E65261B63E8DAB10C28FFE043C033F4BC7F3B3BFD9398678F764A4F9166AD
  • createdAtMillis - 1688536887736
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1676421769304088577684E65261B63E8DAB10C28FFE043C033F4BC7F3B3BFD9398678F764A4F9166AD