Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-05 04:35:37 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 42315DAEB5970D03DF54A5EA6CCBD9E83E0BDE0D1F401B660FD62C7AE4F739F5
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet states as fact that the activities in question were governmental efforts to curtail "disinformation" as opposed to just "information not favorable to the government". It should have read, ". . . a ruling that could curtail efforts to fight alleged disinformation".

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1676421769304088577
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 42315DAEB5970D03DF54A5EA6CCBD9E83E0BDE0D1F401B660FD62C7AE4F739F5
  • createdAtMillis - 1688531737213
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 167642176930408857742315DAEB5970D03DF54A5EA6CCBD9E83E0BDE0D1F401B660FD62C7AE4F739F5