Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-04 12:16:15 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4E9C8D9123E6E92431DA4595B2B9E3215D3B6109113A8DB4ED922CC5955BE521
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet is expressing skepticism at the screenshot; turns out the claim of 94° wet bulb temperatures were inaccurate. This is mentioned later down the thread. In any case, a note about the BS temperature claims might belong on the image, but this tweet is opinion, no note needed

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1676196241561010179
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4E9C8D9123E6E92431DA4595B2B9E3215D3B6109113A8DB4ED922CC5955BE521
  • createdAtMillis - 1688472975408
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16761962415610101794E9C8D9123E6E92431DA4595B2B9E3215D3B6109113A8DB4ED922CC5955BE521