Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-07-04 16:31:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: DC4E35B64C21AC52F5C9E238E85ADBE61396831253CA157DD9A01A08258C29CA
Participant Details
Original Note:
Plaintiff's lawyers argue that even though the request came from a fake identity it was a "third-party request." That's implausible. The plaintiff didn't offer wedding websites at the time and there would be no benefit to an unrelated party submitting a fake request. NNN. https://newrepublic.com/article/173987/mysterious-case-fake-gay-marriage-website-real-straight-man-supreme-court https://www.nationalreview.com/news/correcting-the-record-on-the-fake-same-sex-couple-in-the-303-creative-case/
All Note Details