Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-04 19:32:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9D56EBB9E5CADD5F48318FD5E6707B4DEA85C0A58C8727AC6578696C50B5E236
Participant Details

Original Note:

Plaintiff's lawyers argue that even though the request came from a fake identity it was a "third-party request." That's implausible. The plaintiff didn't offer wedding websites at the time and there would be no benefit to an unrelated party submitting a fake request. NNN. https://newrepublic.com/article/173987/mysterious-case-fake-gay-marriage-website-real-straight-man-supreme-court https://www.nationalreview.com/news/correcting-the-record-on-the-fake-same-sex-couple-in-the-303-creative-case/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1676175950692663296
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9D56EBB9E5CADD5F48318FD5E6707B4DEA85C0A58C8727AC6578696C50B5E236
  • createdAtMillis - 1688499138311
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16761759506926632969D56EBB9E5CADD5F48318FD5E6707B4DEA85C0A58C8727AC6578696C50B5E236