Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-03 23:59:23 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B7D073519946D469C7120F9CBF0371C489031E3D6FAC0FCA7AF329BA053D1FBA
Participant Details

Original Note:

The alleged request from Stewart was not mentioned in the SCOTUS opinion and played no part in the outcome. The plaintiff had standing to bring the case because she established a credible threat of prosecution. The dissent did not mention standing because it was not in dispute. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-476_c185.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1676017385281835008
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B7D073519946D469C7120F9CBF0371C489031E3D6FAC0FCA7AF329BA053D1FBA
  • createdAtMillis - 1688428763243
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1676017385281835008B7D073519946D469C7120F9CBF0371C489031E3D6FAC0FCA7AF329BA053D1FBA