Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-03 15:14:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9B404749E8D9D88AA17AA6C75CAC60C926BB1D307C0C853E8A1B5515BAF3668A
Participant Details

Original Note:

Self proclaimed "Fact checking" websites found to be bias and unreliable. There are dozens of studies and articles that show this, so I'm just providing the most politically neutral one I could find that we can all agree with. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-psychology-of-fact-checking1/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1675879296898854913
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9B404749E8D9D88AA17AA6C75CAC60C926BB1D307C0C853E8A1B5515BAF3668A
  • createdAtMillis - 1688397245076
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16758792968988549139B404749E8D9D88AA17AA6C75CAC60C926BB1D307C0C853E8A1B5515BAF3668A