Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-06 01:17:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 785DCF8BB1A252972474BCEC5C1875CEE748D1CE7CBAB0CCFE4DDF10A2E089CC
Participant Details

Original Note:

Self proclaimed "Fact checking" websites found to be bias and unreliable. There are dozens of studies and articles that show this, so I'm just providing the most politically neutral one I could find that we can all agree with. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-psychology-of-fact-checking1/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1675879296898854913
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 785DCF8BB1A252972474BCEC5C1875CEE748D1CE7CBAB0CCFE4DDF10A2E089CC
  • createdAtMillis - 1688606249795
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1675879296898854913785DCF8BB1A252972474BCEC5C1875CEE748D1CE7CBAB0CCFE4DDF10A2E089CC