Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-03 03:57:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2C18D359088281D0AC1581EA287C4B3CA9483AD33E81C6ED0AD9315579CF4A5A
Participant Details

Original Note:

Although this is probably some conspiracy theory, the tweet doesn't mention the date

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1675623054431641601
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2C18D359088281D0AC1581EA287C4B3CA9483AD33E81C6ED0AD9315579CF4A5A
  • createdAtMillis - 1688356665590
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16756230544316416012C18D359088281D0AC1581EA287C4B3CA9483AD33E81C6ED0AD9315579CF4A5A