Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-07-02 08:27:04 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: D806797FE26701EF1ACF6AF025323B2E90B458331C2D2113FDE12719E88C24F1
Participant Details
Original Note:
Tweet is correct: Court upheld a (hypothetical*) person's use of a religious objection to serving a gay individual as protected under the First Amendment. Using a 'religious belief' to create a de facto 'straight-only' business is now legal directly b/c of this ruling. NNN. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-476_c185.pdf *https://newrepublic.com/article/174048/supreme-court-doesnt-care-gay-wedding-website-case-based-fiction
All Note Details