Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-02 06:42:53 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AB5914C526F3BFE9A1365482B6BCCED22E6C6DBB92409905EBAAEE3CF2CEAE58
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet is correct: Court upheld a (hypothetical*) person's use of a religious objection to serving a gay individual as protected under the First Amendment. Using a 'religious belief' to create a de facto 'straight-only' business is now legal directly b/c of this ruling. NNN. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-476_c185.pdf *https://newrepublic.com/article/174048/supreme-court-doesnt-care-gay-wedding-website-case-based-fiction

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1675367317453111297
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AB5914C526F3BFE9A1365482B6BCCED22E6C6DBB92409905EBAAEE3CF2CEAE58
  • createdAtMillis - 1688280173570
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1675367317453111297AB5914C526F3BFE9A1365482B6BCCED22E6C6DBB92409905EBAAEE3CF2CEAE58