Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-07-02 11:31:24 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 58BB68730946FC48D45D38285B7BFD49DE462AC9985000652E54203347F5A882
Participant Details
Original Note:
Tweet is correct: Court upheld a (hypothetical*) person's use of a religious objection to serving a gay individual as protected under the First Amendment. Using a 'religious belief' to create a de facto 'straight-only' business is now legal directly b/c of this ruling. NNN. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-476_c185.pdf *https://newrepublic.com/article/174048/supreme-court-doesnt-care-gay-wedding-website-case-based-fiction
All Note Details