Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-02 14:59:10 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C517AE3C9F10D749A791388A123D403ECE133BCA1C2C5C743BE4E82A937BE773
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. This is an opinion commenting on the broader implications of the 303 Creative SCOTUS ruling. If you still insist on having a CN, include that sexuality is also a protected characteristic.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1675299061685944321
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C517AE3C9F10D749A791388A123D403ECE133BCA1C2C5C743BE4E82A937BE773
  • createdAtMillis - 1688309950538
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1675299061685944321C517AE3C9F10D749A791388A123D403ECE133BCA1C2C5C743BE4E82A937BE773