Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-02 04:05:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8218E704E3BB4AF17A6AB5DB7B3A16434ED6E2B116BEFB62E76DB684004A3C7C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. This is an opinion commenting on the broader implications of the 303 Creative SCOTUS ruling. If you still insist on having a CN, include that sexuality is also a protected characteristic.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1675299061685944321
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8218E704E3BB4AF17A6AB5DB7B3A16434ED6E2B116BEFB62E76DB684004A3C7C
  • createdAtMillis - 1688270755692
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16752990616859443218218E704E3BB4AF17A6AB5DB7B3A16434ED6E2B116BEFB62E76DB684004A3C7C