Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-01 21:11:36 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 06690C298EC5EC8AE505F1FE9D27FE9DC4E7D8EDB1D2620F8C6AC524D333359D
Participant Details

Original Note:

The author is clearly joking about the new "rate limits", as many people are tweeting about the limits, many people are also viewing the tweets, resulting in a rate limit. (https://www.cnn.com/2023/07/01/tech/twitter-rate-limit-exceeded/index.html) Further discussion belongs in replies (https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/values)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1675225036129554438
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 06690C298EC5EC8AE505F1FE9D27FE9DC4E7D8EDB1D2620F8C6AC524D333359D
  • createdAtMillis - 1688245896899
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 167522503612955443806690C298EC5EC8AE505F1FE9D27FE9DC4E7D8EDB1D2620F8C6AC524D333359D