Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-02 21:29:52 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E5251A59C6E5EFDDBF1F4606EB6FD3F6DADB46FA1ACD6D1DCB0108D34D3BAA5F
Participant Details

Original Note:

It could well be fake, but the tweet not being there now doesn’t necessarily mean that. It could also have been deleted. Would be fine without firm statement that it’s fake or, alternatively, a source.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1675162215949692928
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E5251A59C6E5EFDDBF1F4606EB6FD3F6DADB46FA1ACD6D1DCB0108D34D3BAA5F
  • createdAtMillis - 1688333392023
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1675162215949692928E5251A59C6E5EFDDBF1F4606EB6FD3F6DADB46FA1ACD6D1DCB0108D34D3BAA5F