Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-07-01 15:03:28 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: E667CD0D1A91B71019ECCFF56C4F95F9CF7CD16C051B189C1B819BCCE6553E74
Participant Details
Original Note:
Tweet expresses a factually correct claim. Suggested note says the same thing in a different way. The case was based on whether or not a business owner, based on her religious beliefs, could refuse service to a gay couple. SCOTUS ruled she could. Note not needed. https://www.cpr.org/2023/06/30/supreme-court-303-creative-case-lgbtq/ https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-476_c185.pdf
All Note Details