Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-07-01 15:05:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: D92197146BA0EAA888F9D37C8E1E13476FB5FE5480BBAED18510182CBCE74C3D
Participant Details
Original Note:
Tweet expresses a factually correct claim. Suggested note says the same thing in a different way. The case was based on whether or not a business owner, based on her religious beliefs, could refuse service to a gay couple. SCOTUS ruled she could. Note not needed. https://www.cpr.org/2023/06/30/supreme-court-303-creative-case-lgbtq/ https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-476_c185.pdf
All Note Details