Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-07-01 15:04:46 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 295CB3D7643E7B22C9A112826F8D0973F9AF70C15FABD54628E41A05CCD31DB3
Participant Details
Original Note:
Tweet expresses a factually correct claim. Suggested note says the same thing in a different way. The case was based on whether or not a business owner, based on her religious beliefs, could refuse service to a gay couple. SCOTUS ruled she could. Note not needed. https://www.cpr.org/2023/06/30/supreme-court-303-creative-case-lgbtq/ https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-476_c185.pdf
All Note Details