Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-01 20:40:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E306E1DB639537120418C4F7B55C42AFCA13C6BC296FCFC798D62E54B46D2C25
Participant Details

Original Note:

SCOTUS ruled that the government may not “‘alter’ the ‘expressive content’ of [one’s] message.” Based on this, businesses cannot be compelled to offer products or services to members of the public if the products or services include speech with which the businesses disagree. https://www.jacksonlewis.com/insights/us-supreme-court-first-amendment-entitled-expressive-web-designer-refuse-service-same-sex-couples

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1675143875336314882
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E306E1DB639537120418C4F7B55C42AFCA13C6BC296FCFC798D62E54B46D2C25
  • createdAtMillis - 1688244030292
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1675143875336314882E306E1DB639537120418C4F7B55C42AFCA13C6BC296FCFC798D62E54B46D2C25