Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-01 14:42:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0FFC65D6A8AEC641E783D7768EA188685255E7E0262C9D2DC9AF831F91E0288C
Participant Details

Original Note:

SCOTUS ruled that the government may not “‘alter’ the ‘expressive content’ of [one’s] message.” Based on this, businesses cannot be compelled to offer products or services to members of the public if the products or services include speech with which the businesses disagree. https://www.jacksonlewis.com/insights/us-supreme-court-first-amendment-entitled-expressive-web-designer-refuse-service-same-sex-couples

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1675143875336314882
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0FFC65D6A8AEC641E783D7768EA188685255E7E0262C9D2DC9AF831F91E0288C
  • createdAtMillis - 1688222563003
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16751438753363148820FFC65D6A8AEC641E783D7768EA188685255E7E0262C9D2DC9AF831F91E0288C