Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-04 01:57:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8E461CBFBE1653A3BF6EEDA01936CF4AFC1402A339D22D1E2262C1D2BF27557D
Participant Details

Original Note:

SCOTUS ruled that the government may not “‘alter’ the ‘expressive content’ of [one’s] message.” Based on this, businesses cannot be compelled to offer products or services to members of the public if the products or services include speech with which the businesses disagree. https://www.jacksonlewis.com/insights/us-supreme-court-first-amendment-entitled-expressive-web-designer-refuse-service-same-sex-couples

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1675127735755370496
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8E461CBFBE1653A3BF6EEDA01936CF4AFC1402A339D22D1E2262C1D2BF27557D
  • createdAtMillis - 1688435849466
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16751277357553704968E461CBFBE1653A3BF6EEDA01936CF4AFC1402A339D22D1E2262C1D2BF27557D