Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-07-02 16:28:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: FCBF693EE7F0717AECAB175FA53DA0076949BC57E530CAF23E403753D504D55F
Participant Details
Original Note:
This is a decision about compelled speech treating artistic/written endeavors like a website in this case as a First Amendment issue. As such it is on strong ground, but the real problem is the case should never have been heard as it was a hypothetical, no actual customer. https://law.justia.com/constitution/us/article-3/21-the-requirement-of-a-real-interest.html
All Note Details