Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-07-06 16:28:43 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: BA557FEFECB74D7256EDC0EC9370903A9704AEEA34BBEE0BA9340056857593AE
Participant Details
Original Note:
This is a decision about compelled speech treating artistic/written endeavors like a website in this case as a First Amendment issue. As such it is on strong ground, but the real problem is the case should never have been heard as it was a hypothetical, no actual customer. https://law.justia.com/constitution/us/article-3/21-the-requirement-of-a-real-interest.html
All Note Details