Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-07-01 02:25:31 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: B85D1ECDC2585319DDE7DB33C7C21B233EE2906C31561B92A0CEB162406B6BF0
Participant Details
Original Note:
This is a decision about compelled speech treating artistic/written endeavors like a website in this case as a First Amendment issue. As such it is on strong ground, but the real problem is the case should never have been heard as it was a hypothetical, no actual customer. https://law.justia.com/constitution/us/article-3/21-the-requirement-of-a-real-interest.html
All Note Details