Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-07-01 02:31:02 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: B46099F2A913B5EA7E0BBDB062A99E7DFE954D257CDFFED64DAA1466528115EC
Participant Details
Original Note:
This is a decision about compelled speech treating artistic/written endeavors like a website in this case as a First Amendment issue. As such it is on strong ground, but the real problem is the case should never have been heard as it was a hypothetical, no actual customer. https://law.justia.com/constitution/us/article-3/21-the-requirement-of-a-real-interest.html
All Note Details