Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-07-01 23:22:24 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: A0550C5AF486FEAEFCF781AB8ED5C1F166BCE88F8071C7EC3C53B69E0AFB7342
Participant Details
Original Note:
This is a decision about compelled speech treating artistic/written endeavors like a website in this case as a First Amendment issue. As such it is on strong ground, but the real problem is the case should never have been heard as it was a hypothetical, no actual customer. https://law.justia.com/constitution/us/article-3/21-the-requirement-of-a-real-interest.html
All Note Details