Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-07-02 23:33:29 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 7F3A383762460E16EC0F8892A0A1D67C1779B54840919365D666BA5B427B158D
Participant Details
Original Note:
This is a decision about compelled speech treating artistic/written endeavors like a website in this case as a First Amendment issue. As such it is on strong ground, but the real problem is the case should never have been heard as it was a hypothetical, no actual customer. https://law.justia.com/constitution/us/article-3/21-the-requirement-of-a-real-interest.html
All Note Details