Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-07-02 10:35:56 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 45DD7D5574EAA7A188B7B70F75FEEDC08D004735AE9D63F4FBE38FDD33B475B5
Participant Details
Original Note:
This is a decision about compelled speech treating artistic/written endeavors like a website in this case as a First Amendment issue. As such it is on strong ground, but the real problem is the case should never have been heard as it was a hypothetical, no actual customer. https://law.justia.com/constitution/us/article-3/21-the-requirement-of-a-real-interest.html
All Note Details