Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-07-02 00:27:12 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 3F02C38822C1FFC8453A379567D89C1D95A59CC7B53419592C5A9CB57A110E13
Participant Details
Original Note:
This is a decision about compelled speech treating artistic/written endeavors like a website in this case as a First Amendment issue. As such it is on strong ground, but the real problem is the case should never have been heard as it was a hypothetical, no actual customer. https://law.justia.com/constitution/us/article-3/21-the-requirement-of-a-real-interest.html
All Note Details