Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-07-06 16:38:32 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 3A0B57FC0612A64657560ABF7399122371D3838E0F76D00B24E331B8760462CC
Participant Details
Original Note:
This is a decision about compelled speech treating artistic/written endeavors like a website in this case as a First Amendment issue. As such it is on strong ground, but the real problem is the case should never have been heard as it was a hypothetical, no actual customer. https://law.justia.com/constitution/us/article-3/21-the-requirement-of-a-real-interest.html
All Note Details