Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-07-01 10:00:11 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 01AE7D5DB73A0700F0DC5ABE622C7B9F2378168CCCE90456E296B70F01BDFCDF
Participant Details
Original Note:
This is a decision about compelled speech treating artistic/written endeavors like a website in this case as a First Amendment issue. As such it is on strong ground, but the real problem is the case should never have been heard as it was a hypothetical, no actual customer. https://law.justia.com/constitution/us/article-3/21-the-requirement-of-a-real-interest.html
All Note Details