Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-30 22:17:02 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 679866085D7EC65B35A3764103A8D32262120EDF51FA78A922615AD804EB22DD
Participant Details

Original Note:

Page 1 of the decision states Ms Smith is “willing to work with all people regardless of sexual orientation” & “will gladly create websites for clients of any sexual orientation". SCOUTS ruled she cannot be compelled to create a product not offered on her menu of services. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-476_c185.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1674886589150019584
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 679866085D7EC65B35A3764103A8D32262120EDF51FA78A922615AD804EB22DD
  • createdAtMillis - 1688163422665
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1674886589150019584679866085D7EC65B35A3764103A8D32262120EDF51FA78A922615AD804EB22DD