Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-30 20:49:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 05F7AEB032A558D75096E83279111CB50AFCEFC5D27DFF55D7BD197F0EAB94CE
Participant Details

Original Note:

I'm in favor of the proposed notes, this is to offer counter to the other "not misleading" note. This ruling is to allow a business owner to not have compelled speech based off a patron, not solely because they're gay or against belief. It does not equal "I don't like gays."

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1674875741639507969
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 05F7AEB032A558D75096E83279111CB50AFCEFC5D27DFF55D7BD197F0EAB94CE
  • createdAtMillis - 1688158168562
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 167487574163950796905F7AEB032A558D75096E83279111CB50AFCEFC5D27DFF55D7BD197F0EAB94CE