Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-01 03:51:46 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DBEB7B1E65E9899B8E51AF342939B73159A084ABC081E55EFA6C6E888E5D67A5
Participant Details

Original Note:

This image misquotes the decision by cutting off the end of the sentence. "It has become a disturbing feature of some recent opinions to criticize the decisions with which they disagree as going beyond the proper role of the judiciary." https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/22-506_nmip.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1674848048877273090
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DBEB7B1E65E9899B8E51AF342939B73159A084ABC081E55EFA6C6E888E5D67A5
  • createdAtMillis - 1688183506272
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1674848048877273090DBEB7B1E65E9899B8E51AF342939B73159A084ABC081E55EFA6C6E888E5D67A5