Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-01 11:17:24 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7F06D5C454FF4E2BA78D635FD5794C2EFD35B8F7664C02F6CDDEE917B08638CD
Participant Details

Original Note:

This image misquotes the decision by cutting off the end of the sentence. "It has become a disturbing feature of some recent opinions to criticize the decisions with which they disagree as going beyond the proper role of the judiciary." https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/22-506_nmip.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1674848048877273090
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7F06D5C454FF4E2BA78D635FD5794C2EFD35B8F7664C02F6CDDEE917B08638CD
  • createdAtMillis - 1688210244830
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16748480488772730907F06D5C454FF4E2BA78D635FD5794C2EFD35B8F7664C02F6CDDEE917B08638CD