Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-30 19:56:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E04AFE9DED60C633D06295FEF1E84C47A7E6FDEE2B0860A83A428CE6B722176C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Although the claim is true and the case does legitimate discrimination against LGBTQ+ by businesses, the information provided by the Note is also adequate because it gives context, which is why the Community Notes exists, so the Note can be approved even if it's redundant.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1674815748366123015
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E04AFE9DED60C633D06295FEF1E84C47A7E6FDEE2B0860A83A428CE6B722176C
  • createdAtMillis - 1688155007926
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1674815748366123015E04AFE9DED60C633D06295FEF1E84C47A7E6FDEE2B0860A83A428CE6B722176C