Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-01 11:10:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A56B2F851F9462D6776409BF85616F3C23CC4AE57DAC2E1F2FE387FCB1FCB605
Participant Details

Original Note:

Although the claim is true and the case does legitimate discrimination against LGBTQ+ by businesses, the information provided by the Note is also adequate because it gives context, which is why the Community Notes exists, so the Note can be approved even if it's redundant.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1674815748366123015
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A56B2F851F9462D6776409BF85616F3C23CC4AE57DAC2E1F2FE387FCB1FCB605
  • createdAtMillis - 1688209806765
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1674815748366123015A56B2F851F9462D6776409BF85616F3C23CC4AE57DAC2E1F2FE387FCB1FCB605