Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-30 22:07:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5F47A244E49E0C48B58E375A9FDE6F213A38370798F3FF697430E9915270A7EE
Participant Details

Original Note:

Although the claim is true and the case does legitimate discrimination against LGBTQ+ by businesses, the information provided by the Note is also adequate because it gives context, which is why the Community Notes exists, so the Note can be approved even if it's redundant.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1674815748366123015
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5F47A244E49E0C48B58E375A9FDE6F213A38370798F3FF697430E9915270A7EE
  • createdAtMillis - 1688162864754
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16748157483661230155F47A244E49E0C48B58E375A9FDE6F213A38370798F3FF697430E9915270A7EE