Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-30 21:24:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2E0F6EED5717929ED3D3E94E8447F32435B12386A0C9CF7A1052BEA296DBD7C2
Participant Details

Original Note:

Although the claim is true and the case does legitimate discrimination against LGBTQ+ by businesses, the information provided by the Note is also adequate because it gives context, which is why the Community Notes exists, so the Note can be approved even if it's redundant.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1674815748366123015
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2E0F6EED5717929ED3D3E94E8447F32435B12386A0C9CF7A1052BEA296DBD7C2
  • createdAtMillis - 1688160285924
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16748157483661230152E0F6EED5717929ED3D3E94E8447F32435B12386A0C9CF7A1052BEA296DBD7C2