Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-30 17:45:40 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 17D48B2F8CB456CBCA7F138C364601AC4C4F62C3A818F0DD109AF73FE1B2C5FB
Participant Details

Original Note:

Although the claim is true and the case does legitimate discrimination against LGBTQ+ by businesses, the information provided by the Note is also adequate because it gives context, which is why the Community Notes exists, so the Note can be approved even if it's redundant.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1674815748366123015
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 17D48B2F8CB456CBCA7F138C364601AC4C4F62C3A818F0DD109AF73FE1B2C5FB
  • createdAtMillis - 1688147140586
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 167481574836612301517D48B2F8CB456CBCA7F138C364601AC4C4F62C3A818F0DD109AF73FE1B2C5FB