Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-30 23:50:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 95F720D2835DA365BFE8BBD1EDA67D4C1D390683BD1F0B0674021A4B03F6CF94
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is a compelled speech not religious case. “States may “protect gay persons, just as [they] can protect other classes of individuals, in acquiring whatever products and services they choose on the same terms and conditions as are offered to other members of the public.” https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-476_c185.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1674810856922828809
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 95F720D2835DA365BFE8BBD1EDA67D4C1D390683BD1F0B0674021A4B03F6CF94
  • createdAtMillis - 1688169044101
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 167481085692282880995F720D2835DA365BFE8BBD1EDA67D4C1D390683BD1F0B0674021A4B03F6CF94