Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-30 22:24:46 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1DEE8393056B364D7ADDAD897FD853EC4574BBB0A59366C0E865FFCAC4DA34A4
Participant Details

Original Note:

AH was found to have defamed (with actual malice) JD by a unanimous jury. Both filed appeals however the appeals were withdrawn when the parties reached a settlement changing the judgement amount. The terms have not been disclosed. The jury’s verdict remains intact.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1674810321196707841
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1DEE8393056B364D7ADDAD897FD853EC4574BBB0A59366C0E865FFCAC4DA34A4
  • createdAtMillis - 1688163886816
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16748103211967078411DEE8393056B364D7ADDAD897FD853EC4574BBB0A59366C0E865FFCAC4DA34A4